SSDLife allows you to control how worn your SSDs are in an easy and convenient way, which means you can control how safely and securely your data is stored on them. In our 20GB copy tests shown below, the MX300 performed like MLC NAND-based drives, which sport faster flash memory that doesn’t need caching and doesn’t exhibit performance drop-offs-albeit a slightly slower one. It’s a shame when a drive failure results in all your personal data being lost.
As I said up front, other than the original cloning of the drive, 30GB should generally cover everything you do.ĪS SSD doesn’t write enough data to exceed the MX300’s cache, but that highlights the benefits of treating more of the NAND as MLC. While this vulnerability can only be exploited by an individual with physical access to the drive, deep technical SSD knowledge and advanced.
Using slower TLC with faster cache isn’t an unusable design it’s just that other SSDs designed this way had cache sizes that were inadequate for large write operations. You may have read about a recent report describing a potential security vulnerability in our MX100, MX200 and MX300 products as well as another manufacturer’s products. TestingĪs the 750GB version contains 30GB of cache, no drop-off happened between the AS SSD benchmark software’s 1GB test and 10GB test. It features encryption, and is also said to write data in multiple locations for redundancy (a safeguard against failing cells or NAND chips). The drive comes with a five-year warranty that covers 120GB of writes per day, or about 220TBW (terabytes written). I’m taking the vendor’s word for that-SSD vendors, including Crucial, are making it quite a bit more difficult to open up the case these days. The MX300’s controller is a Marvell 88SS1074, with some tweaking to the firmware by Crucial. Just be aware that Adata's SP550 with the same controller and SK Hynix TLCmemory performed better.The box for the 2.5-inch 750GB MX300 includes a voucher for Acronis True Image HD, so that you can clone your existing hard drive onto the MX300.Ĭrucial sent us the 2.5-inch, 7mm version of the MX300, but an M.2 version will be available later in the year. New interfaces and multitasking demands require more from your system than perhaps ever before. It fell towards the bottom of the drives tested today, though the result is still good on our Lenovo notebook. Crucial® M500 SATA 6Gb/s Solid State Drive Transform your system’s performance. We chose the 480GB model, since it's compared to other 512GB-class SSDs. Thread starter UsandThem Start date Sidebar Sidebar. Unfortunately, we had very little time between receiving our BX200 sample and Crucial's embargo, so we could only test one capacity point. Review Re-Testing Crucial’s P2 SSD After QLC Downgrade - Toms. By recording across several hours using powerful software, we're able to capture a drive's behavior more accurately. Because of when it all happens, though, most reviews miss it. This consumes more power than heavy reads and nearly as much power as a 4KB random write test.
Others wait until a defined amount of cleaning is needed, then wipe the cells at once. Some start the clean-up process right after new data goes to the flash.
Outside of when it's actually being utilized, most of an SSD's power consumption is related to garbage collection and other background flash management activities.Ĭontrollers take a couple of approaches to these tasks.
CRUCIAL SSD TESTING SOFTWARE SOFTWARE
Instead of looking at four-corner power modes, we use BAPCo MobileMark 2012.5 with real-world software and a notebook. We measure SSD power consumption differently than other sites. The chart illustrates why Samsung's 850 EVO is such a good product and why the 480GB BX200 is its polar opposite.
0 kommentar(er)
